Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why not corporate bonds?

0
Posted

Why not corporate bonds?

0

Many corporate bonds pay much more than that meager 5.64% (Nov 1, 2008 – May 1, 2009). The corporate bonds are unsuitable for building the Safety-Cushion Fund for the following reasons: • corporates are issued in $1000 denominations, and usually sold in amounts of 5 or more. • the interest is taxed in the same year that it’s paid. • the best corporate bonds are not available to the public – look for corporate bonds at your broker’s website, the only corporates available are of those failing banks and some other distressed companies amazingly still with highest ratings from Moody’s. • comission fees are too costly (about $10 per trade = $20 round-trip). • if proper diversification requires at least 20 positions, minimum amount 5 bonds per position, face value $1000, then one needs 20x5x$1000=$100,000 to build a properly diversified bond portfolio. Definitely not for everyone. • mutual funds investing in corporate bonds eat interest earnigns with their fees. Practicaly, you take the risk

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123