Why mask the identity of grant makers, researchers, and nonprofits?
It is in Philoptima’s best interest to protect identities until prizes are posted and winning solutions selected. This way, grant makers avoid being hounded and solutions are chosen because of their content instead of the names of well known academics. Similarly, nonprofits compete on the basis of ideas rather than simply because they have national name recognition. When either type of prize is paid out as an award, then, at that time, the respective relationship is made known to both parties. What follows the unmasking is often an intense exchange of more detailed information as solutions and plans are refined for later implementation, data tracking, and evaluation.
