Why does UTC request the allocation for “critical infrastructure industries,” rather than for utilities alone?
This is a means of advancing this issue more quickly and avoiding possible regulatory quagmires that could unnecessarily delay an allocation. The FCC has an established definition for “critical infrastructure industries” (CII) that recognizes the special nature of our communications and provides some minimal protection for existing systems. The definition is narrow: it includes only utilities, pipelines, railroads, metro transit systems and private ambulance services. These industries either use compatible industrial radio systems, or would have no interest in the proposed spectrum allocation. There is no recognized definition for “utilities,” and establishing one could be extremely problematic: for example, telephone companies could easily argue that they should be included in this allocation. Further, UTC as a long-time FCC-certified frequency coordinator has excellent relationships with other CII associations, some of which have indicated a willingness to provide support for this ef
Related Questions
- Should utilities expect to be required to use a dedicated allocation if it is granted? Would they be required to "give back" current spectrum?
- What happens if the eligible grantee wishes to request less funding than the total allocation amount?
- Why is UTC advocating an allocation of dedicated, "private" spectrum?
