Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

WHY CANT I USE A MATHEMATICAL CORRECTION TECHNIQUE (compensating matrix of interferences) TO CORRECT FOR A SENSORS RESPONSE TO INTERFERING GASES?

0
Posted

WHY CANT I USE A MATHEMATICAL CORRECTION TECHNIQUE (compensating matrix of interferences) TO CORRECT FOR A SENSORS RESPONSE TO INTERFERING GASES?

0

Electrochemical sensors do not lend themselves to the use of mathematical correction, a matrix, to correct for cross interfering gases. Although in principle it is possible to carry out a mathematical correction, it is only practical if the sensor’s response to interfering gases is small (typically less than 5%). There are, however, two major technical difficulties in trying to rely on this method to remove the effects of cross sensitivities: • The sensor’s characteristics change continuously with time. This adds a substantial degree of uncertainty. When the interference response of the sensor is large or uncertain, it is impossible to achieve acceptable accuracy by mathematical correction techniques. A better design consists of using a chemical filter or a scavenging electrode to minimize interference. Only when one is assured of the effectiveness of these primary cross interfering barriers, can a limited back-up mathematical correction be used to remove any residual interference. But

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123