Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What’s the harm in extending the ban?

ban extending harm
0
10 Posted

What’s the harm in extending the ban?

0
10

A law should be on the books only if it is justifiable, does what it is supposed to do, and does not infringe people’s rights. If the best that can be said about a law is that it isn’t particularly harmful, that’s not reason enough for it to stand. Two days after the “assault weapon” law took effect, the Washington Post editorialized, “no one should have any illusions about what was accomplished. Assault weapons play a part in only a small percentage of crime. The provision is mainly symbolic.” In doing so, the paper provided one of the reasons the law should never have been imposed. 15.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123