Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What does “As long as multiple peers do not fail at the same time, no peer will see performance degradation that is caused by peer failures” really mean?

0
Posted

What does “As long as multiple peers do not fail at the same time, no peer will see performance degradation that is caused by peer failures” really mean?

0

Barring lots of dropped packets, downstream peers should have the frames they need in time to play them. If your design relies on reorganization of the distribution tree before downstream peers can once again receive frames, then you must provide analysis that shows that, with high probability, the reorganization will happen quickly enough and the new parent(s) will have the appropriate frames. If your design does not require repair first, then you must show analysis that demonstrates that there is sufficient bandwidth to supply all downstream peers now that a peer is missing.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123