What are the Benefits of Nuclear Power?
They include low fuel costs and waste production, as well as the absence of greenhouse gas emissions. Potential pitfalls, of course, include radiation exposure from unprocessed waste, possible accidents or terrorist attacks, and an increase in nuclear materials out on the market for use in potential weapons development. Alternative energy sources such as wind, solar, and hydroelectric are certainly less risky, but nuclear plants can produce much greater levels of electricity. At the same time, nuclear facilities cost much more to build, as well as to decommission once their life cycle is over. Because the technology has advanced, advocates believe the benefits of nuclear power outweigh the risks and costs, though others are not convinced that nuclear power is the best solution. While I personally would rather see a horizon dotted with wind turbines, nuclear power is seen by many as a solution to our energy conundrum. SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: “Are nuclear power plants making a comeba
What wastes are associated with coal-fired plants? Utility considerations: No radioactive waste with coal burning, acid rain, transportation of coal vs. nuclear fuel rods, safety of nuclear reactors, disposal of waste from coal vs. waste from nuclear power plants (nuclear waste disposal at Yucca Mountain), regulation of coal use vs. nuclear fuel use. You will find many more considerations on the web. Read and prepare.
Nuclear power has many benefits over its competitors, including oil, coal, wind, hydroelectric, and near-term solar power. Nuclear power is opposed by those with good intentions but a poor understanding of the risks and benefits of modern nuclear plants relative to the alternatives, and how safety has improved over time. Nuclear power is looked upon suspiciously because its association with the nuclear bomb as well as the emotional salience of “radioactive waste.” A single kilogram of uranium can produce more energy than 200 barrels of oil, and uranium is about as common as tin. Thorium, three times more abundant than uranium, can also be converted into uranium-233 (which is too unstable to be used for bombs) and broken down for similar quantities of nuclear energy. So why the holdup for constructing new nuclear power plants? Well, first, they are relatively expensive to build, although cheap to operate. The lower initial cost of gas, oil, and coal plants has thus made them more econom
