To what extent will todays phone architecture need to be modified to accommodate this specification?
As there are numerous different implementations across various handset OEMs, it is not possible to know how TCGs Mobile specifications might impact their current designs. However, the open standards for security functions included in the Mobile Trusted Module specification are in many cases similar to current functions implemented by each vendor and the specification is deliberately formulated to be abstract and implementation neutral. Participation of various organizations in the specification design process and continuous cross-industrial collaboration has supported the aim of developing an implementation neutral specification. The benefit of the specification is that it would provide a common description of the functions that need to be provided to meet platform security objectives and of the security propreties and capabilities of those functions.
Related Questions
- Can the process of automatic reminders to late reviewers be modified by staff for each reviewer to accommodate occasions when a reviewer has telephoned to ask for a 3-, 7- or 12-day extension?
- Is it true that the architecture of the new A4 is already designed to accommodate a hybrid derivativ?
- To what extent will todays phone architecture need to be modified to accommodate this specification?