Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is weighting appropriate in a rating system?

0
Posted

Is weighting appropriate in a rating system?

0

Some object to that HAPLR gives more weight to some measures than to others. Yet not weighting factors makes a value judgment as well. Not weighting the factors makes them equal in importance. This begs the question; is a library visit truly equal in value to a circulation, an electronic resource session, or attendance at a program? BIX, the German rating system uses weighting, as does HAPLR. The table below indicates the relative weights to possible measures assigned by HAPLR, BIX, and the LJ Index. HAPLR assigns 38% of the values to input measures, BIX assigns 56%, the LJ index assigns 0%. Note that due to the score algorithm of the LJ Index, the final score of a library can be almost totally driven by a single factor. Type Measure HAPLR Relative weight BIX Relative Weight LJ Index Relative Weight Input Expenditure per capita 10% Employees per 1,000 capita 7% 8% Percent Budget to materials 7% Materials Expend.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123