Can the review process be streamlined for resources that have undergone another type of quality review?
The Managing Editor has the authority to decide whether a streamlined review can be conducted on a resource or collection based on the strength of the previous review process and associated documentation. An example case might be a collection of resources that have been thoroughly field-tested with appropriate educational audiences by the owner/creator or collection builder, but the scientific review process was not as rigorous. These resources could be accepted after performing a scientific content review, while additional pedagogical review might be waived. The Managing Editor and relevant Associate Editor(s) would consider each case individually.
