A competitor is claiming “pico-second” reaction time. Is this better?
Let’s put it this way…. If a second were a THOUSAND MILES One nanosecond would be .000005 foot, or about .012 inch (twelve hundredths of an inch). One hundred picoseconds would be .0012 inch (twelve thousandths of an inch). The difference between the two, in regards to the “extra” transients that the supposed “faster” device would see…is meaningless. A nanosecond is 1000 picoseconds. It’s only useful for measuring parts of a nanosecond. If a manufacture is claiming reaction times under a nanosecond with a specific number, he either doesn’t know what he’s talking about…or it is a lie. We have seen one manufacturer that makes such claims and we have, in our possession, a copy of test results that claim exactly the same number…from a different manufacturer. This test was done in the 1980’s…when the technology to accurately measure such events did not exist. Demand that this manufacturer provide written proof from a third-party testing laboratory that is nationally recognized…a
