Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

your notes say that the Siewert classification is used for adenocarcinomas, therefore would the following mapping be correct?

0
Posted

your notes say that the Siewert classification is used for adenocarcinomas, therefore would the following mapping be correct?

0

Oesophageal upper third – C153 Oesophageal middle third – C154 Oesophageal lower third – C155 (Non-adenocarcinoma) Siewert 1- C155 (Adenocarcinoma only) Siewert 2 – C158 (Adenocarcinoma only) Siewert 3 – C160 (Adenocarcinoma only) Fundus – C161 Body – C162 Antrum – C163 Pylorus – C164 After further discussion, we have changed the Siewert 2 mapping. The final mapping should be as follows: Oesophageal upper third – C153 Oesophageal middle third – C154 Oesophageal lower third (Non-adenocarcinoma) – C155 Siewert 1- C155 (Adenocarcinoma only) Siewert 2 – C155 (Adenocarcinoma only) Siewert 3 – C160 (Adenocarcinoma only) Fundus – C161 Body – C162 Antrum – C163 Pylorus – C164 It is important to emphasise that the mapping is one-way only. In other words, the Audit codes can be mapped to ICD-10 codes in the manner above, but ICD-10 codes cannot be mapped to the Audit codes. This is because ICD-10 does not adequately code tumours of the gastro-oesophageal junction, whereas the Siewert classificat

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123