Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Yes, in 3rd world countries, they lack property rights, and why should anybody give it to them when we live fine without letting them have rights?

0
Posted

Yes, in 3rd world countries, they lack property rights, and why should anybody give it to them when we live fine without letting them have rights?

0

No, you have. And it’s amazingly clear. You can’t GIVE rights, you fcken god damn tool. Natural law / rights, doesn’t mean shit to you – does it? That means you fail, and you of course – loving ignorance, wouldn’t have listened to those clips. :rolleyes: My point was nobody CHOSE to sell diamonds to deBeers, they already owned the mines and essentially owned the people working on it! The market probably wasn’t as free from the beginning and that made it easier (or was too free, whatever, the fact is they DO HAVE a monopoly on it). You can’t just OWN the mines, you fucken retard. The world wasn’t created and then there was a god damn debeers mine there before mankind. The countries government chose to sell to these people, ALLOW them in, DO nothing about it etc. YOU DON’T HAVE A MONOPOLY ON IT. I showed you why, you just reject reality. You fcken fail, yet again. :rolleyes: I never said I give a F- about diamonds, you keep ignoring my point that I don’t care about diamonds nor do I thin

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123