Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Would you accept constant surveillance in public areas in exchange for a crime-less society?

April 26, 2017areas constant events Modern politics public sciences social surveillance

0

Posted

Would you accept constant surveillance in public areas in exchange for a crime-less society?

3 Answers

0

Posted

There will never be a crime-less society regardless what surveillance they use, just look at convenience stores they have cameras everywhere and that doesn’t not stop them from being robbed.

0

Posted

Yes. Public is public. Surveillance of a public area is no loss of privacy to anyone.

0

Posted

I live in the UK. So I accept constant surveillance in public areas (pretty much) without a crime-less society. So a crime-less society would be a bonus which I would gladly accept.