Would the network discovery be best served if split into smaller discovery runs?.
For example: • To save time/get quicker more manageable results • To enable end results to be viewable for example if the autoMap Layer 2 Topology drawing had over 100,000 objects in it, it would just be too complex to visualize. It is a much more realistic approach to produce a database for each network subnet, or divide up the discoveries according to your subnets • To handle situations where you have multiple private networks with the same subnet. • Should you make use of the Micro discovery facility, undertaking multiple discovery runs and merging discovery results prior to the drawing production?, For example: • To handle firewalls that you are not allowed to breach, i.e., you can do an initial discovery run which stops at the firewall, then move the Host PC to the other side of the firewall and restart the discovery run adding the results to the same database. • To handle devices with different SNMP Read community strings More detailed information on this is provided in Codima Te
. For example: • To save time/get quicker more manageable results • To enable end results to be viewable for example if the autoMap Layer 2 Topology drawing had over 100,000 objects in it, it would just be too complex to visualize. It is a much more realistic approach to produce a database for each network subnet, or divide up the discoveries according to your subnets • To handle situations where you have multiple private networks with the same subnet.
