Would the General Accounting Office evaluate the adequacy, completeness, and frankness of the Navys internal reports?
As agreed, we reviewed the Naval Audit Service’s work relating to reported violations of the Antideficiency Act and the Navy’s actions to improve control over the Military Personnel, Navy (MPN) appropriation including the Naval Audit Service’s audit plans. We did not make an independent review of the Navy’s obligations and expenditures. ANTIDEFICIENCY ACT VIOLATIONS REPORTED BY THE NAVY The Naval Audit Service identified possible violations in the MPN appropriation in November and December 1971. As a result, the Chief of Naval Operations on April 17, 1972, directed the Navy Inspector General to investigate whether, in fact, violations had occurred. The Inspector General’s investigation confirmed that violations had occurred. In December 1972 the Navy submitted to the President of the United States and to the Congress violations reports on the MPN appropriations for fiscal years 1969, 1971, and 1972. The Navy reported overobligations in the MPN appropriation of almost $110 million, as f
Related Questions
- Is FSCU available to answer questions relative to CALSTARS reports when auditors have sensitive questions they do not want to discuss with internal accounting staff?
- Would the General Accounting Office evaluate the adequacy, completeness, and frankness of the Navys internal reports?
- Where can I find the GAO (Government Accounting Office) reports on video news segments?
