Would Teudogar II be easier or more difficult to write than part I?
One convenient thing about writing Teudogar II – Roman Rule would be that there’d be such a huge amount of timeless occupation stories, anecdotes and subplots to choose from (like Germany 1945, Iraq 2003, Afghanistan 2002, and so on); basically lots of things are really timeless and repeat over and over, whether it’s Alexander’s or Augustus’ or Stalin’s or Bush’s armies. Teudogar I was much more difficult in regard to sources / anecdotes, since almost everywhere where a cilizatory inferior, illiterate country has been invaded, almost all reports we get are purely from the invaders’ point of view. In contrast, occupations have very frequently been endured by people able to report about their experience, so there’d be a wealth of inspirational sources. And of course Roman provinicial life is pretty well documentated by itself. Writing a plot playing in this period I’d have lots of historical accounts, literature, primary sources and so on available, much much more than there ever was abo
Related Questions
- How difficult was it to write in two voices that are so different from one another--a woman who is a recovering alcoholic and an Iranian woman?
- Was the graphical "Loom" for Lucasfilm easier or more difficult to write than your Infocom games?
- Would Teudogar II be easier or more difficult to write than part I?
