Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Would it be better to be an existentialist?

0
Posted

Would it be better to be an existentialist?

0

The soul and body exist simultaneously. The existentialist would have existence occur at birth, which would have existence before the soul whereas the soul is actually already there, only not known, or not well known. Their problem is confusion between whether the soul/personality is present and whether it is manifest. Most people who support murder of infants thru abortion of pregnancies do not recognize a soul in them either, even tho the li’l tyke can kick, or recoil in fear from a knife in the womb. No, existentialists exist in denial and call it “philosophy.” Denial is worse than ignorance–it is ignorance by choice.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123