Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Would HR 1424 Supersede Existing State Laws Requiring Minimum Coverage for Severe Mental Illness?

0
Posted

Would HR 1424 Supersede Existing State Laws Requiring Minimum Coverage for Severe Mental Illness?

0

In all likelihood, yes. HR 1424 contains specific language (page 14, lines 10-17, and page 28 lines 1-8) requiring federal law to supersede any state law that does not provide “greater consumer protections” than the federal standard for BOTH equitable coverage and the DSM mandate. As a result, HR 1424 would supersede any state law that requires minimum coverage for severe mental illness that is LESS than the entire DSM.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123