Would a pay-to-play reform ordinance require the town to replace professional contractors?
Pay-to-play reform ordinances are not retroactive. Professionals violating the ordinance after passage could be terminated and would be barred from future public contracts. However, it is highly unlikely that contractors would forgo future business by continuing their huge political contributions.
Related Questions
- Why are citizens still petitioning for pay-to-play reform after our elected officials already adopted such an ordinance?
- Is it wise of General Contractors to require professional subconsultants to sign their usual sub-contract form?
- Would a pay-to-play reform ordinance require the town to replace professional contractors?
