Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

With its “goods and services” focus, isn the Millennium Assessment overly anthropocentric? What about conservation of biodiversity in its own right?

0
Posted

With its “goods and services” focus, isn the Millennium Assessment overly anthropocentric? What about conservation of biodiversity in its own right?

0

Because biodiversity underlies all ecosystem goods and services, an assessment of the capacity of an ecosystem to provide food, clean water, fiber, storm protection and so forth necessarily must examine the status of the biodiversity of the system and the link between the biodiversity and the service involved. Moreover, as described in the draft design for the assessment, biodiversity would also be examined in its own right independently of its short-term or long-term role in maintaining other ecosystem goods and services. The “goods and services” framework has been suggested for the assessment for three reasons: (1) this is the most useful way to examine the sustainable use of biodiversity, one of the CBD’s three objectives; (2) this framework directly links the findings of the assessment to development needs of countries; and, (3) policymakers in other sectors, including Ministries of Planning or Finance, are more likely to consider the implications of the assessment (including the i

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123