With all these new planets being discovered, will Astrologers have to re-think how they read Charts?
Are you talking about the planets orbiting around other stars? There is no new planets in our neck of the woods. With Pluto all they did was reassign attributes from other planets. How was this done? Who gets to make up the new rules? Makes you wonder if the leading astrologers got together and held a convention to decide what Pluto gets. Edit: “You criticize astrology on its own terms not your ignorant beliefs about its own terms. No one can meaningfully criticize anything from the outside.” How can someone call people “ignorant” about a subject that can’t produce evidence of what is claimed? Certainly our “ignorance” is just a wanting testable proof. It is much easier to disprove a skeptic, than to disprove a believer. If I could ask Markab a question it would be this: How much evidence (and what kind) would be needed for you admit that astrology is possibly false? I can easily admit I’m mistaken about astrology with very little proof. Just by having one person show to the folks at t
