Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Will Sandra Day O’Connor’s resignation from the Supreme Court set women back?

0
Posted

Will Sandra Day O’Connor’s resignation from the Supreme Court set women back?

0

Since Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court has reviewed many cases on women’s reproductive health according to the NARAL website. Every year the margins become narrower. Any choice Bush finds acceptable is also likely, given the opportunity, to further erode women’s health and reproductive rights. And although it is unlikely that Roe v. Wade will be unilaterally overturned in the near future, conservatives have been doing a great job shrinking the scope of Roe v. Wade ever since Bush took office. We’ve already witnessed the 2003 ban on what conservative spin-marketers term “partial birth” abortion. But don’t believe the hype. This is a ban on a medical procedure that can be performed as early as the second trimester, when a so-called “birth” is clinically questionable. This ban also narrows a doctor’s choice on what procedure is the safest for a patient, placing an undue burden on women’s health. While “pro-life” advocates fight to get fetuses the same human rights as grown women, they sim

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123