Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why Would Using MsgConnect Be Easier than Using Conventional Ways of Communication?

0
Posted

Why Would Using MsgConnect Be Easier than Using Conventional Ways of Communication?

0

First of all, MsgConnect hides the details, but keeps them available for use. The framework lets you fine tune a transport object to achieve maximum performance for any type of application, from occasional messaging to heavy data exchange. And, if you don’t want to go into the details, MsgConnect will work perfectly with its default settings. Of course, you will need to design the protocol; in other words, define what messages are used for different purposes in your application. This will be a part of the application’s business logic. You won’t need to dig into the details of TCP protocol implementation or manage security for MMF. The second thing is that message exchange is universal. With MsgConnect, the message can contain any binary data and the recipient can change this data block and send it back with the same message. In other words, the sides of the data exchange can do round-trip data transfer with just one message. The result is that MsgConnect can be used in both single-dire

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123