Why would Minnesota need standards parameters to preserve and promote fundamental American principles or prohibit work-based learning?
Minnesota needed them because the National Standards (on which the rejected Profile of Learning standards were based) promote the multi-cultural view that our founding documents are mere constructs of that era. They also redefine education as job training for specific careers. Minnesotans do not want a repeat of what the Profile delivered. The Profile standards were content standards from the National Standards, such as the National Standards for Civics and Government, The National History Standards, the Curriculum Standards for Social Studies, and the federal work skills standards (SCANS). As stated in the publication Inside the New Federal Curriculum, According to multiculturalism, the principles of national sovereignty, natural law and the natural rights of life, liberty and property may have been useful for the culture that embraced them 200 years ago, but that does not mean these principles are appropriate for us today. Multiculturalism is the opposite of the self-evident, truths,
Related Questions
- FIA Principles and Standards of Fundraising Practice prohibit the use of percentage based remuneration. What alternative forms of incentive based remuneration could be offered to fundraisers?
- Why would Minnesota need standards parameters to preserve and promote fundamental American principles or prohibit work-based learning?
- What is the population of Bayport, Minnesota?
