Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why would it be better to look at living cells rather than dead cells?

0
Posted

Why would it be better to look at living cells rather than dead cells?

0

It depends what you’re doing. If you’re going to be assessing function or seeing movement, you want to look at a live cell. For example if you wanted to see what happens when flagella grow, you need to have the cell alive to see that effect. If you’re studying anything with metabolism, growth, differentiation, you need to have the process happen to your sample under the microscope. The cell needs to be alive or these processes. If you’re going to look at a live cell you can’t stain it so you’re going to want to look at it in phase contrast. If you have any more questions or need clarification let me know.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123