Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why worry about seismic risk in the portfolio?

0
Posted

Why worry about seismic risk in the portfolio?

0

A recent probabilistic study [2] by FEMA utilizing HAZUS to compare earthquake risk across the United States found that over 75% of potential average annual earthquake loss ($5.3 billion) in the US is situated on the West Coast and 66% of the total potential is concentrated within the State of California. However, $1.1 billion or 23% of annualized earthquake risk is distributed throughout the remainder of the US; some in areas that are not considered as having earthquake risk by investors and the financial markets. In 2006, EQECAT conducted a study focusing on potential industry damage and loss resulting from a cascading earthquake rupture along the southern portion of the San Andreas fault and concluded that such an event could result in insured losses in excess of $27 billion on average and up to $50 billion if the Cholame/Coachella segment were to rupture. If such an event occurred, this would affect population and assets extending roughly from the City of San Bernardino in the nort

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123