Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why weren the multiprocessor PDP-11s released commercially?

multiprocessor released
0
Posted

Why weren the multiprocessor PDP-11s released commercially?

0

There have been dark rumors about this for many years, all emanating from non-DEC sources with no direct experience of the multiprocessor systems. The most commonly heard “conspiracy theory” rumor is associated with the introduction of the VAX 11/780 about the same time. It holds that the 11/74 would have outperformed the VAX by a factor of (2, 4, 8, 16, pick any random number), and so DEC had to pull the PDP-11/74 to sell VAXes. Emotionally appealing, perhaps, but untrue. Also implausible in light of Ken Olsen’s well known love of the PDP series, and the PDP-11 in particular. It has also been said that the KB11-CM backplane was too expensive to manufacture and sell at a profit. However, the differences between a KB11-C and KB11-CM backplane were not extreme, and in any case all DEC’s wire-wrapped backplanes were produced on automated Gardner-Denver wirewrap machines. Complexity of that particular part was not an issue. The truth about the 11/74’s non-introduction is a rather disappoin

0

There are dark rumors about this, all emanating from non-DEC sources with no direct experience of the multiprocessor systems. The most commonly heard rumor is associated with the introduction of the VAX 11/780 about the same time. It holds that the 11/74 would have outperformed the VAX by a factor of (2, 4, 8, 16, pick any random number), and so DEC pulled the PDP-11/74 to sell VAXes. Emotionally appealing, but untrue. Also implausible in light of Ken Olsen’s well known love of the PDP series. It has also been said that the KB11-CM backplane was too expensive to manufacture and sell at a profit. However, the differences between a KB11-C and KB11-CM backplane were not extreme, and in any case DEC’s wire-wrapped backplanes were produced on automated Gardner-Denver wirewrap machines. Complexity of that particular part was not an issue. The truth about the 11/74’s non-introduction is that it was a disappointingly simple business decision. “The product was technically quite successful. Fina

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123