Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why were only four bridge crossing alternatives evaluated?

0
Posted

Why were only four bridge crossing alternatives evaluated?

0

The alternatives initially considered in the screening process included a total of 15 bridge-replacement, transit, freight-movement, and travel-demand-management alternatives. Eleven alternatives were not advanced beyond the first level of screening as they did not address the project purpose and need and project goals. On the basis of the screening evaluations of the initial alternatives considered; input received during outreach meetings; and the later design studies conducted to address the height limitations set for the bridge-replacement alternatives by the Federal Aviation Administration and other stakeholders, the following refined bridge-replacement alternatives were evaluated in the DEIS: • “New” Alignment South (formerly 6-lane Replacement Bridge – South) • “New” Alignment North (formerly 6-lane Replacement Bridge – North) • “Existing” Alignment South (formerly Twin Replacement Bridges – South) • “Existing” Alignment North (formerly Twin Replacement Bridges – North) Click her

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123