Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why were China and Japan more successful than the two Muslim empires in holding the Europeans at bay?

0
Posted

Why were China and Japan more successful than the two Muslim empires in holding the Europeans at bay?

0

-China – isolated themselves from Europe entirely, internal economy (similar pattern of open-to-close-back to open economy as Japan) -Ming: trade important, rich merchants and poor gov., gov regulated trade…shut down international trade and LARGE internal economy arose ” -Qing: took over after Ming, wI Mandate of Heaven-Divine Right -Japan – isolated themselves, let Europe in, felt pressures, semi-isolated themselves; Shogunate = military absolutist Gov. (while open trade with Euro), country thrived under Tokagawa Family of rulers (during latter isolation pd) -Ottomans – foreign merchants, traded with France (not regulated by Gov), lost $ blc traded raw for manufactured materials, over expansion and shift of trade weakened the central gov.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123