Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why was the 16×16 prediction size chosen?

chosen prediction size
0
Posted

Why was the 16×16 prediction size chosen?

0

The 16×16 area corresponds to the Least Common Multiple (LCM) of 8×8 blocks, given the normative 4:2:0 chroma ratio. Starting with medium size images, the 16×16 area provides a good balance between side information overhead & complexity and motion compensated prediction accuracy. In gist, experiments showed that the 16×16 was a good trade-off between complexity and coding efficiency. What do B-pictures buy you? A. Since bi-directional macroblock predictions are an average of two macroblock areas, noise is reduced at low bit rates (like a 3-D filter, if you will). At nominal MPEG-1 video (352 x 240 x 30, 1.15 Mbit/sec) rates, it is said that B-frames improves SNR by as much as 2 dB. (0.5 dB gain is usually considered worth-while in MPEG). However, at higher bit rates, B- frames become less useful since they inherently do not contribute to the progressive refinement of an image sequence (i.e. not used as prediction by subsequent coded frames). Regardless, B-frames are still politically c

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123