Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why was an earthquake warning sent instead of a tsunami warning?

earthquake sent tsunami warning
0
Posted

Why was an earthquake warning sent instead of a tsunami warning?

0

Because at the time, there was no information as to how big a quake had to be in order to generate a tsunami. We knew we had experienced an unusually strong quake, and many people acted and moved to higher ground, but we were waiting on an evaluation and official word. This is an issue we’re working with NOAA and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) to correct, so we’ll have the ability to do faster assessments in the future. Upon the Governor’s suggestion following the March 19, 2009 Tsunami Warning, we established a back-up UHF two way radio system called ‘EASCOM” to enable key people connected with EAS to communicate quickly and reliably, even in the event of telephone system disruption or overload. The system was in place, and proved invaluable in providing emergency communication on the morning of September 29. The Governor’s Security, DPS (Police Dispatch), Homeland Security (EOC), NOAA, and Radio Stations KKHJ, KSBS, KULA, Showers of Blessing, KVZK TV Station and Blue Sky

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123