Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why then do Science teachers always talk about malaria and sickle cell anaemia?

0
Posted

Why then do Science teachers always talk about malaria and sickle cell anaemia?

0

A 3: Inadequate knowledge, or plain ignorance is the simple answer. I repeat: malaria affects sickle cell anaemia patients more seriously than it does others. A sickle cell anaemia child is one who has inherited sickle cell genes from both parents [S from father, and S from mother] producing the phenotype SS. A child inheriting a sickle cell gene [S] from just one parent, and a normal haemoglobin gene [A] from the other parent is called Sickle Cell Trait [AS phenotype]. This child does not have sickle cell anaemia, and reacts to malaria differently. Even those Science teachers who know this difference between sickle cell anaemia [2 haemoglobin S genes] and sickle cell trait [1 haemoglobin S gene] teach, wrongly, that the AS phenotype is immune to malaria. It certainly is not, but (and this is where the confusion arises) the sickle cell trait child before the age of 4 years, withstands better the lethal effects of malignant malaria (ie Plasmodium falciparum ) than either the sickle cell

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123