Why the lack of positiveness with in Religious explanations for the proof Creation?
Ironically, a reasonable case could be made that scientists sometimes engage in similarly flawed logic. They commit what could be called the ‘nature of gaps’ fallacy. Some researchers presume that an unknown force or phenomenon of nature must fill all the gaps in human knowledge and understanding. Many theoreticians have appealed to the existence of unknown laws, principles, constants, dimensions, or hypothetical variations in the constants and laws of physics to explain a gap and dissolve supposed evidence for supernatural intervention. Stuart Kauffman and other scientists at the Santa Fe Institute, for example, without any observational support of physical evidence, appeal to a hypothesized “fourth law of thermodynamics.” They say that this imaginative law spontaneously produced a high degree of order, complexity, and information content where none existed. That’s how they explain the ‘natural,’ sudden, and very early appearance of life on Earth despite the lack of both a primordial
