Why the change in name from Coordinated Compliance Review (CCR) to Categorical Program Monitoring (CPM)?
In addition to stating precisely what this process is designed to do – monitor categorical programs – the new title replaces the word “review” with “monitoring.” The term review had come to signify an “event” that occurred only once every four years. Monitoring, on the other hand, implies a process – one in which the local educational agency (LEA) is an active participant on an ongoing basis. The change from CCR goes beyond a name change; the process itself has a tighter statutory focus. Under CPM, the process centers on both the statutory monitoring requirements for LEAs and the California Department of Education (CDE). The CPM monitoring instruments have tighter adherence and alignment with state and federal law. The instruments are used by CDE monitoring teams to test for compliance. Return to Top of Page 2. Do LEAs have more responsibility for monitoring compliance with CPM? LEAs have always been responsible for maintaining compliant categorical programs whether they were scheduled
Related Questions
- May a compliance officer who reports outside athletics (to the president) provide the outside review of the compliance program?
- Does the IRMA Anti-Piracy Compliance Program include the review of song writing and publishing rights?
- Why the change in name from Coordinated Compliance Review (CCR) to Categorical Program Monitoring (CPM)?
