Why spread a hunter’s current points across all categories, when that results in an unfair advantage for hunters with a significant number of points?
There are several reasons why hunters might have a large number of accumulated points. Certainly some of those reasons are due to applying for popular hunts over the years. No change can address every hunter’s situation and our proposal attempts to be as fair as possible. The vast majority of hunters have fewer than three points, so the way points have been addressed should not have a significant or long-lasting impact on drawing odds.
Related Questions
- Why should the WGCs [World Golf Championships] get bonus points? Don players in the WGCs get an unfair advantage since the fields are smaller and there is no cut?
- Do hunters lose all of their deer points if drawn for one of the deer categories?
- Do Labour really have an unfair advantage in the British election system?