Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why should the United States bear a significant burden in this kind of effort when much of the problem is a legacy of the Soviet Union and other nations are also at risk of a terrorist attack?

0
Posted

Why should the United States bear a significant burden in this kind of effort when much of the problem is a legacy of the Soviet Union and other nations are also at risk of a terrorist attack?

0

Multilateral cooperation is highly desirable in any situation that cuts across political and cultural boundaries and should certainly be pursued. Nevertheless, the US cannot afford to delay a global cleanout—at the risk of a catastrophic terrorist attack against us at the cost of hundreds of thousands of lives—while the attempt to get more of the international community on board proceeds.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123