Why Should the Citizens have to Investigate the Crime Instead of Local, State or Federal Law Enforcement?
Instructions to Jury in case of Grand Theft: Below is a modified version of the California Judicial Council’s jury instruction describing what the prosecution would have to prove in order to convict someone of theft: To prove that the defendant is guilty of theft, the People must prove that: 1. The defendant took possession of property owned by someone else; 2. The defendant did this without the owner’s consent; 3. When the defendant took the property he intended to deprive the owner of it permanently to remove it from the owner’s possession for so long a period of time that the owner would lose a major portion of the value or enjoyment of it; AND 4. The defendant moved the property, even a small distance, and kept it for any period of time, however brief. California Penal Code 487 487. Grand theft is theft committed in any of the following cases: (a) When the money, labor, or real or personal property taken is of a value exceeding four hundred dollars ($400), except as provided in sub
Related Questions
- Why Should the Citizens have to Investigate the Crime Instead of Local, State or Federal Law Enforcement?
- If the US government restores $2 billion cut from state and local law enforcement, will crime be reduced?
- How is law enforcement on the local, state and federal level getting involved in identity theft issues?
