Why should our company use Raj Abhyanker, LLP for corporate, patent and trademark services instead of a larger firm?
In short, quality, focus, and cost. Patent and trademark prosecution quality often suffers in general practice law firms (e.g., large law firms with many attorneys practicing in diverse areas), because many such firms see patent and trademark prosecution as a “loss-leader” for litigation, licensing, and other types of work. Furthermore, venture backed companies may not get enough attention from highly skilled partners in helping them form, structure, and negotiate complicated corporate documents and contracts in a larger firm. Because of a lack of focus on corporate, patent and trademark, many general practice law firms lack optimized back office support for corporate, patent and trademark services. In addition, general practice law firms tend to be inefficient and much more expensive for corporate and patent legal tasks because they offer a “one-stop-shop” service rather than a focused “best-of-breed” approach. Some general practice firms claim that because they do both patent litigat
Related Questions
- Why should our company use Raj Abhyanker, LLP for corporate, patent and trademark services instead of a larger firm?
- Why should our company use Raj Abhyanker, PC for corporate, patent and trademark services instead of a larger firm?
- Why should our company use Raj Abhyanker, LLP for corporate and patent services instead of a different law firm?
