Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why should I use Mach-II instead of Fusebox?

April 26, 2017fusebox mach-ii

0

Posted

Why should I use Mach-II instead of Fusebox?

1 Answer

0

Posted

Being OO in nature, Mach-II better supports a loosely coupled and tightly cohesive style of development. This leads to software that is easier to maintain (and enhance). The choice really boils down to the style of the developer/development team. If you or your team are comfortable with (and/or want to learn more about) OO design and development then Mach-II is a compelling choice. On the other hand, if you prefer to work with procedural code then Fusebox may be a better fit.