Why should I use HOBLink JWT instead of CITRIX MetaFrame?
Advantages of HOBLink JWT vs. CITRIX MetaFrame: • No special server component necessary for the communication, only the native Windows Terminal Server is required. • HOBLink JWT can be installed and configured very quickly and easily. • Only a web browser (Java Virtual Machine) on the client side is required. • Universal Printer support (Easy Print) Only two printer drivers are necessary on the Windows Terminal Server, and printing is possible to all printers in the company; this includes network printers as well as local printers. • Central installation of HOBLink JWT on a web server. • No master browser required for Load Balancing. • Maximum data security; requires HOBLink Secure (optional), and provides: Windows Terminal Server Protection over the Internet; Data Encryption based on SSL 3, supporting RC2, RC4, DES, 3DES and AES algorithms; the ability to build up a PKI (public key infrastructure) for strong client authentication. • Less expensive than CITRIX at purchase price and mai
Related Questions
- I already have CITRIX MetaFrame and I want to extend additional licenses with HOBLink JWT. Can HOBLink JWT co-exist with CITRIX MetaFrame using the same Terminal Servers?
- Does the load balancing component of HOBLink JWT also have a "master browser" like CITRIX?
- Why should I use HOBLink JWT instead of CITRIX MetaFrame?
