Why should a faculty member be held to a time clock when the hours worked are frequently an inseparable combination of research, instruction, and service?
This concern is frequently expressed by faculty members and has often been argued with federal auditors and other officials. The university world recognizes that it is extraordinarily difficult for faculty members to separate for accounting purposes what is essentially integral in the academic environment. The federal authorities maintain, however, that, in order to benefit from federal sponsorship, universities must devise some viable means to estimate and record allocations of faculty time to various functions. The alternative is not to accept federal support. Actually, our monitored workload system is not as onerous as faculty members might fear before gaining some experience with it. They are not required to hold a stopwatch on themselves. They merely have to affirm, once per year, that they have actually divided their working time in accordance with the percentages of time indicated on their current appointment form (and, if they at any time realize that they will not be able to s
Related Questions
- Why should a faculty member be held to a time clock when the hours worked are frequently an inseparable combination of research, instruction, and service?
- Won’t this hurt research productivity because faculty will have to spend a lot more time teaching?
- What happens if hours on the time clock do not match hours recorded on the employees check?
