Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why Revise the Conceptual Framework?

conceptual framework revise
0
Posted

Why Revise the Conceptual Framework?

0

The existing Conceptual Framework was written by FASB in the 1970s and 1980s. When issued, it represented a significant advancement of accounting thought and provided a basis for the transformation of financial reporting standards through the adoption of the asset-liability view. The asset-liability view represented a departure from the traditional view that accounting should focus on the measurement of income through the matching of costs with revenues. In contrast, the asset-liability view focuses on defining and measuring assets and liabilities, determining income via changes in these balance sheet accounts. The asset-liability view is based on the logic that it is necessary to define and measure the beginning and end points (the balance sheet) of a transition before measuring the transition (the income statement) itself. Standards setters, including FASB, have long preferred the asset-liability view of accounting because the focus on income measurement proved to be inconsistent wit

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123