Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why not use a regularized form of a natural language as an international language?

0
Posted

Why not use a regularized form of a natural language as an international language?

0

In our opinion, a language which looks and sounds similar to a natural language is problematic. First, it often appears to be a bad version of a natural language to native speakers. Once usage of a given language is established, it is very difficult and even disturbing for people to modify it. Second, even a modified version of a natural language still carries with it the potential for cultural and linguistic imperialism. 4. Is Ayola a revision of any other constructed language, such as Esperanto, Loglan, or Interlingua? It is essentially impossible in creating a constructed language to produce a result that does not share some features in common with previous attempts. The term ‘revision’ implies a high correlation between the original and the revised version, i.e. a correlation coefficient of 75 -100%. The correlation between Ayola and other previous international languages such as Esperanto, Interlingua, and Loglan is considerably less than this range for the three principal grammat

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123