Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why not use a full URI (Universal Resource Identifier) based path?

0
Posted

Why not use a full URI (Universal Resource Identifier) based path?

0

URI’s would promise more than the Filesystem Library can actually deliver, since URI’s extend far beyond what most operating systems consider a file or a directory. Thus for the primary “portable script-style file system operations” requirement of the Filesystem Library, full URI’s appear to be over-specification.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123