Why not reserve a number of Knesset seats for nationally elected MKs?
Having a number of MKs elected nationally might seem to be a beneficial compromise between direct representation (single-representative constituency) and the proportional system. However, there are serious drawbacks to this approach. The presence of nationally elected MKs dilutes the influence of regionally elected MKs. Realizing that larger population centers have more voters, nationally elected MKs are more likely to address the interests of larger population centers. This results in the under-representation of citizens in peripheral areas. A system that combines regionally elected MKs with nationally elected MKs produces legislators of different status. Regionally elected MKs have a clearly defined one-to-one relationship of empowerment and accountability with their constituents. If legislative action is required or desired by citizens in a district, the citizens and the MK know who is responsible to address that issue. Nationally elected MKs have no such direct, regional responsibi
