Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why not jCo version 3.0?

April 26, 2017jco version

0

Posted

Why not jCo version 3.0?

1 Answer

0

Posted

We studied jCo version 3.0 when it was released and found there were technical changes but no functional benefits. The end results are the same whether you use 2.1.8 or 3.0: the same BAPIs and RFCs are exposed. However the internal Java code was significantly different which would have required us to port CF2SAP for no evident benefit. So long as SAP supports 2.1.8 we see no reason to move to 3.0.