Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why Not Cheaper Stationary Recumbent Bikes?

0
Posted

Why Not Cheaper Stationary Recumbent Bikes?

0

Look, you use a stationary bike to get in shape and to burn fat. The Schwinn 231 Recumbent Bike does several things cheaper bikes can’t. Plus it does a lot of what much more expensive machines do. Here’s why you should avoid cheaper machines and consider the Schwinn 231. Tough construction… See, exercise bikes take a pounding. Pedaling a bike requires a well-built machine or you get a lot of swaying and rocking. That’s no fun if you’re riding, but there’s more. A cheap, light bike as it starts to sway and rock tears itself to pieces. The moving loosens the machine and it comes apart. Then you have a pile of junk. Not so with the Schwinn stationary bikes. you get heavy construction… made to use. Speaking of using… Comfort… Who can stand to ride an uncomfortable machine for long? A cheap bike with a cheap seat is a waste. What you want is a big, durable, comfortable seat that lets you stay on long enough to really get a training effect. That’s the way you burn fat and lose weight

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123