Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why Not BioMass Fuels Instead of FossilFuels???

0
Posted

Why Not BioMass Fuels Instead of FossilFuels???

0

1. BioMass Fuel Production in sufficient quantities diverts far too much area of vital agricultural lands away from food production and more people starve, more life forms become extinct. 2. BioMass Fuel may be cleaner than coal or oil but BURNING ANYTHING RELEASES CO2 into the air = more GHG emissions. 3. MASS MONOCROP BioMass Production of any kind is not sustainable nor is it eco-friendly, ESP IF organic methods and crop rotation are not used. 4. If Forests are destroyed for the sake of producing BioMass Fuels, even more CO2 will be released into the atmosphere, ESP if these Forests are cleared by burning as has been happening in the Rain Forests of the Amazon, for instance. Forests are also the “Lungs” of the earth. (Wangari Mathai’s word). Forests help counteract CO2 emissions and all kinds of poisons. Forests clean our land, water, air — Nature’s “Capture -Sequester” mechanism, aka the process of “Terraforming” our Earth, which means creating habitable and sustainable environmen

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123