Why not an eval version for Linux? I cannot see now if its what I need.
– May 3, 2007 CVIcc versus gcc Nice, although a bit late. I had rather seen support of the gcc compiler and not some cvi specific c compiler. Just the graphics libraries and hardware drivers together with gcc, because this could make cvi immediately interface with realtime operating systems like rtai. – Mar 30, 2007 Evaluation version desparately needed… It would be highly recommended to have an evaluation version to play with, even if it is a limited-capability version. Without it, there may not be enough CVI developers out there who could make a strong argument to their superiors to make a purchase. I assume that even if a general download is not provided, that an evaluation version could be made available from a local NI app-engineer. I’ve asked twice, and was disappointed both times. – Dec 6, 2006 Tell more on hardware requirements CVI on Linux is for sure something a lot of people have waited for.
